|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Archived News November 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Week Starting : 28th November Turner Lays Out Framework For Future Pensions Settlement Three years in the making, the Pension Commission’s report was finally published this week. And following the ‘well informed’ leaks to the Financial Times ahead of its publication, it contained no real surprises. What it does do however is build on its cogent analysis of the current pensions scene, current and future issues and the options for tackling them laid out in its interim report published last year. It then comes up with a well explored and reasoned set of recommendations for a future pensions settlement. As indicated in the interim report it develops and tries to strike a balance between the 3 main ‘acceptable’ options open to us : saving more, contributing more or working longer/retiring later. Amongst its main proposals are :-
Reactions to the report were predictable. The Treasury ‘rubbished’ the Commission’s cost calculations and said the proposals were ‘unaffordable’; most employers’ groups objected to the prospect of compulsory contributions into the NPSS; the TUC were hostile to the prospect of seeing state pension age rise to 68 and the Financial Services industry objected to the prospect of the NPSS being run by the state rather than themselves. John Hutton, the new Secretary of State at the DWP – one of whose predecessors had commissioned the report - bravely conceded that he thought the Commission’s proposals were affordable, thereby disagreeing with the Chancellor’s views and maybe limiting his future job prospects. However, whilst most of the interested parties sought to cherry-pick the bits they liked, there does seem to be a general consensus building (amongst all but the Treasury) that the recommendations do form the basis for a framework going forward. So now the great pensions debate begins and the Government will publish its formal response in the Spring. Click here to see TAEN’s press release….
Scrap Default Retirement Age To Help Facilitate Later Working Says Pensions Commission
Lord Turner lists a number of key public policy levers
to help achieve these
From TAEN’s point of view its gratifying that the Commission has taken on board and is advocating many of the policy recommendations which are so close to our own heart and which we have been campaigning for. This includes the view that the national default retirement age of 65 to be introduced in next year’s age discrimination regulations is incompatible with the aim to help people to be able to work later and delay their eventual retirement. The Commission is recommending there should be no age at which it should remain possible to dismiss people for age-related reasons.
Benjamin Disraeli, a British Prime Minister, supposedly remarked back in the 19th Century “There are lies, damn lies and statistics.” As a politician he was only too well aware of how official statistics could be distorted or bent to support or disprove government performance and policies. Since Disraeli’s time, the gathering and use of official statistics has increased manyfold but public faith in official data has, if anything become even lower. In a recent survey only 14% of the public believed the Government used official statistics honestly. In an attempt to counter this public cynicism, Gordon
Brown has announced the Government’s intention
to make the UK’s Office of National Statistics
independent. Karen Dunnell, the national statistician, welcomed the announcement as “an important step forward in enhancing the integrity of official statistics.”
‘Disability’ Label Spells Career Death A new study from Warwick University reveals just how much stigma is still attached to disability amongst private sector employers. Researchers collected the experiences of managers, disabled and non-disabled employees and staff representatives from 260 private sector and English local authorities. They found that disabled people working in the private sector were often unwilling to declare themselves as disabled because it would mean ‘career death’. They also experienced a contradiction between corporate policy and organisational practice which led to a significant degree of cynicism about their employers’ commitment to dversity.
M&S Tops 1000 Workers Aged Over 65 Marks & Spencers, which no longer has a mandatory retirement age, now has 1,000 employees over the age of 65. This is 40 times the number they had when they first scrapped their set retirement age 3 years ago. M&S’s Employment Policy Manager, Sally Humpage told an audience last week that scrapping their fixed retirement age had suited the company. Half of its 60,000 in-store workforce is over the age of 40. She said, “We treat our older workers like anyone else. Many of them enjoy the social aspects of work.” From next year all its employees aged 65 will be
able to go on contributing to their pension and to
have the flexibility of drawing part of their pension
whilst continuing to work on part-time.
Week Starting 21st November Hutton Lays Out 5 Principles For Pension Form With just days to go before Lord Turner’s Pension Commission publishes its recommendations, John Hutton - the new Secretary of State at the Department for Work & Pensions – this week outlined the 5 principles by which he (and we) should judge any future pensions reform package. They are :-
Mr Hutton said the Government would approach the forthcoming report from the Pensions Commission with an open mind and seek to secure consensus across all parties in the future. He added, “We approach this debate with a genuinely open mind. This is the start of the debate not the end of it… We’ve ruled nothing in and we’ve ruled nothing out.” Pity then that on the morning of John Hutton’s speech to the Institute for Public Policy Research, it emerged that Gordon Brown has already ruled out what many believe will be two of the Pension Commission’s main recommendations. Namely that the basic state pension be raised to the level of the minimum income guarantee (currently circa £109 a week) and the link between the basic state pension and earnings, rather than prices, be restored. Informed sources say the Chancellor has decided the proposals are not affordable and will veto them. However, only time will tell whether as the Prime Minister-in- waiting, his is the only opinion which really counts on what is affordable, simple and sustainable.
Controversial Claim About Extra Cost To Employers of Raising State Pension Age A new report from the Cass Business School has claimed that raising the state pension age to 67 would cost employers an extra £4 billion a year in additional absenteeism costs - because according to the report, older workers take more time off due to ill health. On closer examination it appears the approach used to arrive at this headline- grabbing £4 billion total is somewhat suspect. Its based on the difference in the projected additional costs which might arise between an assumption that average state pension age in 2025 was either 62.5 years or 67. As state pension age for women will have risen to 65 by 2020 its hard to see how average state pension age could possibly be 2.5 years earlier some five years after the ages for men and women are equalised. In addition to its claims of higher levels of sickness absence amongst older workers - a claim not borne out by research conducted by members of the Employers Forum on Age and others - the report also states that older workers are less productive than their younger colleagues. The measure of productivity used is not any figure related to output at work but takes real earnings as a proxy for productivity. And because the average real earnings of people fall off once they get into their fifties, they are automatically judged to be less productive. The author of the report, Professor Mayhew, does go on to say, “Raising the state pension age maybe a potential solution to our savings crisis but it is imperative that government understands the full implications and viability of such a move. Any increase in the state pension age needs to be supported by an integrated government approach to tackle barriers to longer working. The nation’s ability to work longerdepends upon its health, and businesses ability, and willingness, to employ older workers. It is no good raising retirement age if people are physically unable to work for longer or are discriminated against in the workplace.” Cass Business School are calling for an independent body committed to an integrated approach across all government departments which would consider issues of health, age discrimination, employment and training, as well as pensions.
According to Manpower’s latest Employment Outlook survey, medium sized businesses are the most likely to be recruiting new staff in the run up to Christmas. Some 15% of medium sized businesses are intending to increase their headcount, as compared with 11% of large and10% of small businesses. Mark Cahill of Manpower said the job market is still healthy enough that employees are happy to move around and employers are willing to replace to them.
The Office of National Statistics this week updated its
‘Focus on Older People’ report.
Week Starting 14th November
According to a report in the Financial Times this week, the Pensions Commission is likely to propose lifting the basic state pension but at the same time raising state pension age to help pay for it. According to the FT’s report the Commission’s recommendations will include :-
The Commission is due to deliver its final report at the end of the month. Its chairman, Lord Turner, who had been due to speak at TAEN’s Annual Conference last month, decided to go into virtual purdah in late summer, only coming out of it briefly to deliver a speech at the TUC Conference. The BBC’s Economics Editor Evan Davies described the FT’s report as “extremely plausible”.
A new survey commissioned by Help the Aged shows that only 13% of the adults questioned thought they’d made adequate pension provision for their retirement. More than 6 out of 10 (62%) think that their pensions will not provide enough to live on in retirement. The survey, conducted by NFP Synergy also asked whether respondents’
felt they had worked enough years to ensure a decent pension,
38 per cent of women felt that they had not compared to just
21 per cent of men. Almost a third of women (31 per cent)
conceded they had no real idea as to whether they had paid
enough into their pension for it to be worth anything in the
future, as opposed to just 24 per cent of men. MORI’s survey also exposes a worrying level of ignorance about the levels of retirement income with 22 per cent having absolutely no idea how much the Basic State Pension is worth per week, despite a clear future reliance on it for many of those questioned. Michael Lake, Director General of Help the Aged commented:
The Prime Minister told the House of Commons that the Green Paper on Incapacity Benefit Reform is now expected to be published early in the New Year. This is the third time the publication date has been deferred and reflects the fact there have been 3 different Secretaries of State at the Department of Work & Pensions during the 12 months. The delay will give the present new incumbent, John Hutton, much needed time to come up-to-speed with his new brief.
The Government Actuary’s Department (GAD) moved swiftly to rebut stories which appeared in the Daily Telegraph and Daily Mail, following leaks of the Pensions Commission’s likely recommendation that state pension age should be increased to 67. Both papers had claimed that 1 in 5 men wouldn’t reach retirement if the age was increased. GAD’s press release says that “Based on current mortality rates, we expect 3.4% of men and 2.1% of women who reach their 65th birthday to die before their 67th birthday. That is 96.6% of men and 97.9% of women will survive from their 65th to 67th birthdays.” Currently 16.5% of men and 11.5% of women die before they reach 65.
Recruitment prospects are expected to worsen over the next 3 months. The CIPD’s latest Labour Market Outlook survey found that only a third of UK employers are expecting to actually increase staff numbers over that period. However nearly 4 out of 5 employers (79%) do intend recruiting staff between November and the end of January. The survey also found :-
John Philpott, the CIPD’s Chief Economist commented, “The influx of Eastern European migrant workers shows no signs of waning and probably explains why the unemployment claimant count of people on Jobseekers Allowance has increased this year paradoxically alongside an increase in employment.”
A study of 250,000 employees by Lancaster University and Manchester Business School has shown that job satisfaction is closely linked to mental health. Low job satisfaction can lead to emotional burn-out, reduced self-esteem and depression and anxiety. According to Professor Cary Cooper of Lancaster University Management School, a number of factors are currently affecting job satisfaction. Changing working practices and technological advances have made many jobs more inflexible and automated. At the same time, increased work loads and job insecurity are adding to stress levels. Professor Cooper has urged employers to come up with innovative policies to tackle the consequences of job dissatisfaction and associated health problems. He points to the potential substantial economic and psychological costs of unhappy employees and says that workers who are satisfied by their jobs are more likely to be healthier as well as happier Depression and anxiety are now the most common reasons for people starting to claim incapacity benefit, overtaking musculoskeletal problems such as back pain.
Week Starting: 7th November Law Society Says Age Regulations Won’t Work The Law Society has told the Government that the draft age discrimination laws won’t work and will simply create difficulties for employers unless last minute changes are made. It is also asking for more guidance and practical examples for employers to follow. Of particular concern are both the new ‘right to request working on past retirement’ provisions and the new duty to justify different treatment on the grounds of age. The Law Society says that each request to go on working will need to be considered individually but points out that the legislation does not provide any criteria against which to assess the request. Kevin Martin, President of the Law Society, commented, “ As the regulations stand at present, we fear that clear criteria may be impossible to devise and many employers may be tempted to adopt a policy of refusing all requests to work on past compulsory retirement age.”
Age Drops To Bottom of Equalities Hierarchy One of the very strong criticisms of the draft age regulations is that they will only apply to employment and vocational training. The regulations will not cover goods, facilities and service – which would extend their impact way beyond just employment and training . This is something ‘age’ campaigning organisations like TAEN have been aware of ever since the EU passed the Equal Treatment Directive back in 2000. It is also something we’ve disagreed with. Earlier this week the ‘sexual orientation’ lobby managed to get protection from discrimination in goods, facilities and services (GFS) added to the protection enjoyed by their strand as the Equalities Bill was debated in Parliament. This now means all the other strands (gender, race, disability, religion or belief and sexual orientation) covered by the Equal Treatment Directive will extend to GFS – except age. Unless the Government, in the shape of the DTI, can be persuaded to change their mind.
The gender pay gap between men and women working full-time closed
over the past 12 months – but only slightly. Jenny Watson, acting chair of the Equal Opportunities Commission, described the latest figures as "grim". Even though the difference has decreased slightly in the past year, it has only reduced by around 12 per cent since the Equal Pay Act came into force in 1975. Commenting on the figures she said, "Thirty
years on from the Equal Pay Act coming into force, the law has
reached the limits of its usefulness. Unless radical new action
is taken, another generation of women can expect to suffer the
injustice of unequal pay."
The Trades Union Congress (TUC) has called for an urgent overhaul of training to address the serious skill gaps which are hampering many parts of the economy. TUC research based on reports from other organisations, reveals that two thirds of businesses do not offer any training to their staff and almost 40% of the workforce received no training last year. The employees who do receive training are likely to be higher up in their organisations. Whilst three quarters of employers offered some form of training to their professional staff over the past 12 months, less than half made the same offer to their staff in manual jobs – despite employers saying that the largest skill gaps exist amongst those doing manual jobs. The TUC’s report – Training, who gets it ? – says nearly two thirds of companies expect responsibility for training to shift more to the individual employee in future.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| © TAEN 2006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||